I've got my head stuck in the cupboard! I can't SEE anything!
Friday, April 10th, 2009 10:24 am.
I dare you to watch this without cracking up:
Insani-TEA - Rachel Maddow contemplates all that tea-bagging.
The one endearing quality that all these wingnut types have is their adorable cluelessness. They seem never to have learned the meaning of the phrase "basic research". Take, for instance, their enthusiastic co-opting of the term "teabagging". (Check the link if you need to - I'll wait.) They've done dumb things before, but my gods! If the Republican Party had actually tried to come up with a tactic that would ensure they'd be laughed at pretty much everywhere, they couldn't have done a more stellar job than they have here. It could be seen as a kind of snarky poetic performance art - if they hadn't proved time and again that such things are beyond their ken. Irony is a mineral they're woefully lacking in, after all.
In this clip, Rachel Maddow, Girl Reporter, tries valiantly to take the issue seriously, but fails, to our benefit. Really, how can a responsible reporter be expected not to fall on the floor laughing at this sort of drivel? It's the kind of thing you'd expect to see on SNL, as a parody. It's priceless, and the funniest thing about it is, as I mentioned, their complete and utter inability to understand why they're so ridiculous. They're just so CUTE - I wish I had a camera right...oh, wait.
But there's just one thing bothering me. Someone please explain why Jon Stewart hasn't assigned one of his correspondents to do a piece on this. Because it's just MADE for Jason Jones.
ETA: Because nobody does it like the master:
IndigNation! Populist Uprising '09 - The ENRAGEning
Jon contemplates the challenges involved in teabagging the White House.
He Wins the Toobs every time.
I dare you to watch this without cracking up:
Insani-TEA - Rachel Maddow contemplates all that tea-bagging.
The one endearing quality that all these wingnut types have is their adorable cluelessness. They seem never to have learned the meaning of the phrase "basic research". Take, for instance, their enthusiastic co-opting of the term "teabagging". (Check the link if you need to - I'll wait.) They've done dumb things before, but my gods! If the Republican Party had actually tried to come up with a tactic that would ensure they'd be laughed at pretty much everywhere, they couldn't have done a more stellar job than they have here. It could be seen as a kind of snarky poetic performance art - if they hadn't proved time and again that such things are beyond their ken. Irony is a mineral they're woefully lacking in, after all.
In this clip, Rachel Maddow, Girl Reporter, tries valiantly to take the issue seriously, but fails, to our benefit. Really, how can a responsible reporter be expected not to fall on the floor laughing at this sort of drivel? It's the kind of thing you'd expect to see on SNL, as a parody. It's priceless, and the funniest thing about it is, as I mentioned, their complete and utter inability to understand why they're so ridiculous. They're just so CUTE - I wish I had a camera right...oh, wait.
But there's just one thing bothering me. Someone please explain why Jon Stewart hasn't assigned one of his correspondents to do a piece on this. Because it's just MADE for Jason Jones.
ETA: Because nobody does it like the master:
IndigNation! Populist Uprising '09 - The ENRAGEning
Jon contemplates the challenges involved in teabagging the White House.
He Wins the Toobs every time.
no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 06:24 pm (UTC)I must say I have the greatest admiration for Ana Marie Cox for not once bursting out into fits of giggles.
no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 07:21 pm (UTC)Or John Oliver.
See, I think John would be perfect for the in-studio analysis afterward. He'd be brilliant pontificating about history and tea and the Queen, and getting all outraged, and wrap it up with some deflating zinger. Actually, Jon, no. It was revolutionary 200 years ago. Now it's just silly.
I find Jason's the man for on-the-street, because he somehow manages to get people to dig themselves in deeper with every word. He's got this deadpan style that seems to disarm the clueless. It's awesome.
no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 08:35 pm (UTC)Actually, Jon, no. It was revolutionary 200 years ago. Now it's just silly.
LOL! YES! I can so see him saying that! Do you listen to his weekly podcast? It's hysterically funny, especially if you like brit humor (which I do). If you haven't you must take a listen!
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/the_bugle/
no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 08:36 pm (UTC)So, how many people in the YT comments have asked, "What's so funny?"
Edited to use REALLY appropriate icon.
no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 09:00 pm (UTC)Jon kills me - all he has to do is look at the camera with that "WTF" look and I fall apart.
I'd love to be in the same room when someone tells that idiot Beck, or one of these other Rep pundits what they're actually referring to - it would be the biggest "wash your mouth out with soap" moment in the history of the Republican party.
*snort*
no subject
Date: Friday, April 10th, 2009 11:26 pm (UTC)Thanks for the link! I had no idea he did a podcast. Will bookmark to check regularly.
no subject
Date: Sunday, April 12th, 2009 03:13 am (UTC)HEE.
no subject
Date: Sunday, April 12th, 2009 05:41 pm (UTC)I suppose it just goes to show that no one in the conservative movement knows what's going on in the world outside their little bubble of weirdness. So what's next? Felching? Salad Tossing? *snort*
no subject
Date: Sunday, April 12th, 2009 11:11 pm (UTC)